Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @8ZL6BBD from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only with the permission of the ally in question so long as they can do the same with us, and only target individuals or organizations with suspected ties to terrorists, if there is substantial evidence that a potential problem exists.

 @3HNRB33answered…3yrs3Y

No, I believe that not only does it damage our relationships with our allies but we should be working with them if our goals are shared and not spying on them.

 @558YLXVanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, collecting intelligence against foreign nations, including allies and partners, is a normal and expected function of all States.

 @8WNZXJ4 from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Only survey places that are more likely to have terrorists. Our allies are supposed to be our allies and we are supposed to all trust each other. We have a strong military if anything were to happen with an ally, but I'd hope we don't have to.

 @6K36GJH from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No. Did the NSA prevent 9-11? The guy was in a sand bunker watching porn and playing Xbox, and we couldn't stop him.

 @6HDD83R from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only with the consent from the country in question, and should be allowed the option to withdraw their consent if necessary

 @8WP9ZHD from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but to an extent. It helps find possible terrorist attacks but at the same time it's invading their personal rights. The US wouldn't want a foreign country to do that to them.

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad, even though surveillance of all foreign countries could be essential to tracking potential terrorist threats.

 @83MT9F6 from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we should only be surveying and spying on countries that are threats

  @michaelconnely from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

The question is too simplistic. I cannot answer in such a broad format.

 @8SFDLS6 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

No, countries should instead work together to thwart terrorist threats as cooperation is the best option for rooting out such operations.

  @michaelconnely from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8MKJFKZ from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends if countries are monitoring us or have a history of terrorism. Before I form a full opinion I will have to do more research.

 @8QNN3CF from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TVYZQL from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the U.S. should be open with their allies and gain their consent to do this.

 @6HM8ZBP from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only related to ongoing military and anti-terror operations, not political surveillance

 @7W3SBDC from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, we must do everything to protect homeland security, but these surveillance systems are not be abused.

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad. Lets be friends with everyone possible

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad. Lets leave every country alone, and be friends with everyone

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad. Lets create peace and be friends with every country in the world.

 @89LDGSX from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only on individuals with ties to terrorism, not whole countries with innocent civilians

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but the surveillance should be transparent with any information received regarding a potential terrorist threat shared with intelligence of the allied country

 @8FPLGKD from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the US should instead open an international intelligence initiative to combat terrorism.

 @8HDL7G8 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only to those who are dealing with or working with those who mean to harm the United States

 @8L3W97X from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8LSVCGK from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @kaparker from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but continue or start it if suspicious of terrorist or activity of any sort

 @8PH5546 from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PSV2S4 from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but we should do so in cooperation with their NSA equivalents and in limited scope to include antiterrorism and criminal investigations only.

 @Maxx48503800 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the NSA should prioritize cyber-security, and defense strategies over surveillance.

  @8TKFNNS from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No it should be replaced with a New Improved Alternative Version called American Overreach Security or known as AOS.

 @8TWB9FX from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TXC7WM from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Only extremely suspected nations because spying on allies is an awful idea.

 @8WPB2FQ from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, surveillance of all foreign countries, but is have to be mutual, this is because it will give equality in the alliance

 @8XTW3QC from Washington D.C.  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y2PZNR from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y6ZVGL from VI  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with the support and permission of said country when terrorist threats are suspected and/or threat to both the USA and ally.